There are basically three systems of law governing intestate succession in Nigeria. These are:
(i) Common Law,
(ii) Laws of Administration of Estate in various state; and
(iii) Customary Laws
The factor, which determines which system is to apply in every case, is the type of marriage contracted by the intestate person. Where a person who contracted a statutory marriage dies intestate, his real and personal estate will be distributed according to the provisions of any local enactment relating to administration of estate, and where none exist, the common law intestacy rules will apply. See Zaidan v. Mohsons [1973] All N.L.R. 86.
(i) Common Law,
(ii) Laws of Administration of Estate in various state; and
(iii) Customary Laws
The factor, which determines which system is to apply in every case, is the type of marriage contracted by the intestate person. Where a person who contracted a statutory marriage dies intestate, his real and personal estate will be distributed according to the provisions of any local enactment relating to administration of estate, and where none exist, the common law intestacy rules will apply. See Zaidan v. Mohsons [1973] All N.L.R. 86.
Thus,
having regard to the fact that, an intestate contracted marriage under the Marriage Act, the law which governs his
or her intestate succession is the Administration of Estate Law of the
state which he or she was residing when he or she died intestate.
The law
governing intestate succession in Lagos State is Section 36 (1) of the Old
Marriage Act known as Marriage of
Ordinance which was applicable in
Lagos, when it was a British Colony and after Nigeria got its independence from the British and
subsequently when Lagos was made a
Federal territory. The said Section
36(1) provides that:
“where any person who is subject to customary law
contracts a Marriage in accordance with the provisions of the Marriage
Ordinance and such person dies intestate after the commencement of this law
leaving a widow or husband or any issue of such marriage any property of which
the intestate might have disposed by will shall be distributed in accordance
with the provisions of this law, any customary law to the contrary
notwithstanding”.
However,
after the creation of Lagos state, the Lagos State
Government repealed or omitted the Section
36 (1) supra vide Section 1 of
the Lagos State (Applicable Laws)
Amendment Edict (1972) and adopted the Administration
of Estate Law of Western Region
which is the law governing the estate of an intestate in the states which made
up the old western region.
Nevertheless, the provisions of the Administration of Estate Laws in Lagos
State and other Western States on
intestate succession as provided in Section
49 (5) are similar to the repealed Section
36 (1) of the Marriage Act.
In Salubi v. Nwariaku (2003) 7 NWLR (Pt. 819) 426 at 453, Paras. F- H Ayoola
JSC succinctly brought out the difference between Section 36 of the Marriage
Act and Section 49(5) of the Administration of Estate Law thus:
The
only difference in the two provisions is that while section 36(1) of the
Marriage Act incorporated English law (fixed at the date of the enactment 1914)
into our laws of intestate succession by reference, the later statute has
directly and not by reference substantially incorporated the contents of the
then current English law on the subject in its provisions with the consequence
that it was not necessary to search for what the English law on the matter was.
The
source of section 49(5) was itself Cap. 115 of the Laws of the Federation and
Lagos, 1958 modified to signify the end of incorporation of English law by
reference. The provisions of section 49(5) of the Administration of Estates
Law, particularly in the portion rendered in italics in the quotation above, leave
no room for any doubt that the estate in this case fell to be distributed in
accordance with the "provisions of this Law", that is, the
Administration of Estates Law and not English law or customary law.
It is not necessary to embark on any further analysis of the reasoning of the court below that led to the conclusion that section 39(1) of the Marriage Ordinance applied. It suffices to say that it proceeded on erroneous premises in material respects. In the later case of Obusez v. Obusez (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 736) 377; (2001) FWLR (Pt. 73) 25 the court of Appeal [Oguntade, Aderemi and Chukwuma-EnehJJ.C.A.] departed from the decision of the Court [Akpabio, Akintan and Ige, JJ.C.A.] in the present case. I am of the opinion that the court below was in error when it held that the applicable law governing the distribution of the estate is as prescribed in section 36 of the Marriage Act even though that error was not of significant consequence to the method of distribution of the estate. The applicable enactment is section 49(1) of the Administration of Estates Law, Laws of Bendel State. The court below should have made an order in terms that the estate of the deceased stood to be distributed to all the beneficiaries of the estate in accordance with that Law.”
It is not necessary to embark on any further analysis of the reasoning of the court below that led to the conclusion that section 39(1) of the Marriage Ordinance applied. It suffices to say that it proceeded on erroneous premises in material respects. In the later case of Obusez v. Obusez (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 736) 377; (2001) FWLR (Pt. 73) 25 the court of Appeal [Oguntade, Aderemi and Chukwuma-EnehJJ.C.A.] departed from the decision of the Court [Akpabio, Akintan and Ige, JJ.C.A.] in the present case. I am of the opinion that the court below was in error when it held that the applicable law governing the distribution of the estate is as prescribed in section 36 of the Marriage Act even though that error was not of significant consequence to the method of distribution of the estate. The applicable enactment is section 49(1) of the Administration of Estates Law, Laws of Bendel State. The court below should have made an order in terms that the estate of the deceased stood to be distributed to all the beneficiaries of the estate in accordance with that Law.”
It is
very clear from subsection 5 of section
49 of the Administration of Estates
Law that, the intention of the law maker is that customary law be excluded
in relation to the estate of persons to which the subsection applies. It is also very clear that the above
provision deals with succession to intestate property of a person married under
the Marriage Act who died intestate while residing within Lagos State. See Per Onnoghen JSC Obusez v. Obusez (2007) 10
NWLR (PT. 1043) 430 at 459 , H-B– 460,paras
Section 49(5) of the Administration of
Estates Law, Laws of Lagos State provide
that, in the event of a spouse married under the Marriage Act dying intestate
and being survived by his spouse and
children , the surviving spouse shall be entitled to two thirds of the real estate of the intestate.
This entitlement to two thirds of the estate of the
intestate makes such a spouse a beneficiary of the estate of the intestate and
a qualified person to apply for letter of administration of the estate of her
late husband.
Thus,
it glaring from the foregoing that, the property of a person who married under
the Marriage Act but died intestate
would ordinarily devolve to his wife. Aboki,
JCA, Motoh v. Motoh (2011) 16 NWLR
(pt. 1274) 474 at 530, paras. B-C puts it succinctly thus:
“The
position of the law is that, where a man who marries under the statute dies
intestate, his estate is only inheritable by the wife legally married under the
Marriage Ordinance or Marriage Act.”
Notwithstanding,
the position of the law expound above, by virtue of Section 26 of the Lagos State Administration
of Estate Law other beneficiaries of the intestate such as his children
(including children born out of wedlock during the subsistence of the marriage)
and relations which includes: brothers, sisters, half-brothers and
half-sisters, aunts, nephews, nieces and in some cases friends are eligible to
apply for letters of administration. See UBA
v. Obianwu (1999) 12 NWLR (Pt. 629) 78. Nevertheless, the surviving spouse
takes precedence over the children and the relations of the intestate.
In Obusez v. Obusez (supra) the Supreme
Court rejected the argument that,
the
grant of letters of administration to the 1st respondent (the
surviving spouse) along with the 2nd respondent (a friend of the
intestate), who is a total stranger to the deceased family to the exclusion of
the appellants should not have been made and that the grant was a wrong
exercise of discretion resulting in a miscarriage of justice and a derogation,
from the appellants constitutionally guaranteed right to family life.
Also,
where the intestate has divorced his wife and his surviving children are still
minors or under-aged, the letter of administration will be granted to the
divorced spouse. In Administrator-
General v. Coker (1948) 16 NLR 11, it was held that, inspite of the
divorce, the mother was in the circumstance the right person to represent the
child during minority and that, the grant should be issued jointly to her and a
relative of the deceased.
Do you intend to apply for Letter of Administration or you have issues on who is entitled to apply for it, in the circumstance, you are advised to contact Akintunde Esan for further illumination.
Akintunde Esan, Managing Partner/Principal Consultant, Ase Olodumare Chambers
GOOD NEWS !
If you lack the necessary funds to pay for the 10 percent (10%) of the value of the money in the Bank Account of the deceased required to be paid to the Probate Registry in order to obtain Letter of Administration.
Contact Ase Olodumare Chambers or Akintunde Esan for further information.
GOOD NEWS !
If you lack the necessary funds to pay for the 10 percent (10%) of the value of the money in the Bank Account of the deceased required to be paid to the Probate Registry in order to obtain Letter of Administration.
Contact Ase Olodumare Chambers or Akintunde Esan for further information.
WHO IS ENTITLED TO APPLY FOR LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATE IN NIGERIA is a legal illumination of AKINTUNDE ESAN known as The LEGAL ADVISER ONLINE. Akintunde Esan is the Managing Partner & Principal Consultant @ ASE OLODUMARE CHAMBERS (Legal Practitioners/Consultants & Chartered Mediators)
Click to view :
HOW TO GET A DIVORCE IN NIGERIA : THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
CUSTODY OF A CHILD: WHAT THE COURT WILL CONSIDER IN AWARDING CUSTODY OF CHILDREN IN NIGERIA
Click to view :
HOW TO GET A DIVORCE IN NIGERIA : THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
CUSTODY OF A CHILD: WHAT THE COURT WILL CONSIDER IN AWARDING CUSTODY OF CHILDREN IN NIGERIA
hello, lovely and very informative article here. I have two question though.. is there any Law in Nigeria that specifically state the category of people that can be grantees of a Letter of Administration? My second question also is .. Can a letter of administration be obtained by a Registered Trustee e.g a bank trustee in conjunction with a family member of a deceased person who died intestate to administer on behalf of the deceased children who are minors in an instance where the deceased specifically remove the spouse's name from the list of beneficiaries of his/her death benefits and made the minors the next of kin. i would appreciate an answer quickly. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteThank you sir for this enlightening and educative piece of article. I have two questions, which goes thus:what rights of succession does a surviving wife of an intestate have in the estate of the deceased who dies in Lagos having being married under Native Law and Custom and 2. what law is applicable?
ReplyDeleteChat with me on WhatsApp @ 08073828487
ReplyDelete